Showing posts with label SAG. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SAG. Show all posts

Monday, May 18, 2009

SAG Hardliners' Picnic No Walk in the Park



What if you held a picnic and nobody came? That’s almost where Membership First found itself yesterday. A beautiful day, a heavily promoted event, yet the SAG faction was only able to draw about 70 people to its Griffith Park / LA Zoo shindig, reports Variety.

SAG President Alan Rosenberg, who spoke at the picnic cum rally, predicted “a good chance” of defeat for the pending TV/theatrical deal, but that seems unlikely if MF can only attract a handful of members to an event in LA, considered the group’s stronghold. The ballots go out tomorrow (Tuesday the 19th), with a June 9 return date, so we’ll know in a few weeks whether the MF tigers still roar or whether they’ve turned to paper.

From the Digital Media Law Blog by J Handel - Great source of info for film and media related issues, especially SAG!

Monday, February 2, 2009

In-Depth Analysis of the SAG-AMPTP Situation

Here's the most in-depth analysis that we've seen in a while regarding the SAG-AMPTP situation. It's consolidated, and informative. It also provides multiple links that provide information on the history of the current affairs. Quick summary is that SAG has diminshed a lot of its bargaining capacity, but all is not lost.

SAG-Studio Pregame Report

by Jonathan Handel

With kickoff in the SAG vs. studios matchup just a day away, what better time for a pre-game report? Let’s look at length, leverage, and deal points.

1. Length

The SAG negotiations are well beyond any OT contemplated by the NFL. That may be one factor that leads some people to assume the two-day meeting this Tuesday and Wednesday will result in an immediate deal. Not so fast, bucko. Union negotiations aren’t played according to sudden-death rules. The SAG negotiating team has an obligation to seek the best deal achievable, and I anticipate they’ll do so. That’s different from seeking the best deal imaginable, which seemed to be the previous SAG administration’s playbook, but it’s not the same thing as throwing in the towel.

To read the entire article, click here!

Friday, January 30, 2009

How the DGA Closed the Deal


While the Screen Actors Guild and the Writers Guild of America have been grabbing headlines for the past year, the Directors Guild of America has mostly gone back under the radar.

A year ago, the DGA achieved a rare stretch of public notice when it came to an agreement with the Alliance of Motion Picture & Television Producers on Jan. 17. That fomented hope that the writers strike might end, after talks broke down between the WGA and the producers six weeks earlier.

By the time the WGA put down its picket signs on Feb. 12, the DGA's profile outside of Hollywood had receded. Insiders remember, though, that the DGA leaders had averted an impasse that would have compounded the WGA stalemate -- partly by conducting its own research over the previous two years into the parameters of new media and by maintaining an extensive dialogue with the AMPTP and key member companies.

To read the full article, click here

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Who Needs Movies - We Can Just Watch SAG for Drama!

SAG's Rosenberg still defiant

Dissent not dissuading guild president


The SAG standoff over national exec director Doug Allen remains inflamed, with president Alan Rosenberg still defiant in the face of efforts by the board's majority to topple Allen.

"These people are like children," Rosenberg said of his opponents in a Tuesday interview with Daily Variety. "They refuse to take responsibility for anything they do."

The moderates have pledged they will fire Allen on grounds that he's bungled SAG's negotiations, defied the will of the board and left members without a new feature-primetime contract for nearly eight months. Despite having the votes to toss Allen out, the moderate wing was blocked by Rosenberg and his allies at the Jan. 12-13 board meeting via a 30-hour filibuster.

Rosenberg said it remains unclear when the strike authorization may be sent out as he and Allen attempt to persuade other board members to go along with a new plan to enter last-ditch negotiations with the congloms, then send the final offer out to the members without a recommendation. The moderates have already ridiculed the plan, saying they don't trust Allen.

Rosenberg questioned the latest promise by the moderates, asserting they may not have enough votes to dismiss the exec by the process of obtaining individual written signatures -- which could be submitted before the end of the month. "I suspect that they can't get enough votes for written assent, which would take us back to the dark ages," he added.

Click here to see the full article

Article on the Possible SAG Strike, in CounterPunch

Capitulation in Hollywood

SAG Watches It All Slip Away

By DAVID MACARAY

While American labor unions are having their usual rough time of it (not to mention the additional burden of having weathered eight brutal years of Elaine Chao as Secretary of Labor), the Screen Actors Guild (SAG) is facing not only potential defeat in the form of getting jammed with an inferior contract, but stands to be dealt a bitter humiliation. And the entity applying that humiliation isn’t its long-time adversary, the AMPTP (Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers). It’s SAG’s own membership.

Typically (and understandably), a union membership wants it all. That’s the standard dynamic. The members want a first-rate union contract, with all the goodies; but, because of the dangers involved, they want it to come all neatly wrapped up, without any risks. There’s a baseball analogy. The manager goes out to the mound and glibly instructs the pitcher on how to pitch to a dangerous batter: “Don’t walk him, but don’t give him anything to hit.”

What SAG’s rank-and-file wants from its leadership is much the same thing. Bring us back a good contract, a substantial contract, an improved contract, but don’t ask us to join you in a battle or otherwise sacrifice anything important to get it. Above all, don’t ask us to get tough.

Click here to see the full article

Thursday, December 25, 2008

SAG Ready to Call it Off?


Emergency Meeting Called for January 12-13
By Dave McNary

SAG's postponement of its strike authorization vote may signal that its leaders are tilting in a more moderate direction -- so much so that the divisive vote may be called off.

It's still unclear what direction the national board will take at its emergency meeting on Jan. 12-13, scheduled ostensibly by national exec director Doug Allen and president Alan Rosenberg to persuade the fractured 71-member panel to present a united front and convince members to vote up a strike authorization.

But the timing of the Monday night announcement was telling. It came a few hours after Allen and Rosenberg met with leaders of the Unite for Strength faction, a group of Hollywood moderates who gained five board seats in the fall after campaigning on a platform that asserted that Rosenberg and his allies had bungled the contract negotiations strategy.

Unite for Strength spokesman Ned Vaughn told Daily Variety that he and his colleagues expressed concerns about going ahead with the vote, given the growing numbers of SAG members - particularly high-profile stars such as George Clooney and Tom Hanks - coming on the "no" side.

"We felt that in light of what's been happening that it would have been reckless for the national board to proceed without having the chance to reconsider," Vaughn said. "We appreciate that they've taken our concerns seriously."

Read the full article here

Monday, December 15, 2008

Stars Send Anti-Strike Letter to SAG

We at crewnewmexico.com want y'all in the New Mexico Film Industry to stay informed about the latest happenings with SAG. Article by Dave McNarry, Variety Magazine.

Stars send anti-strike letter to SAG

by Dave McNarry

Over 130 stars have come against the SAG strike authorization, including George Clooney, Matt Damon and Tom Hanks.

The list also includes Alan Alda, Jason Alexander, Alec Baldwin, Steve Carell, Sally Field, Helen Hunt, Diane Lane, Helen Mirren and Charlize Theron.

In a letter sent Monday to leaders of the Screen Actors Guild, the stars cited the weakening economy as the key factor in their move. They also said that it's time to "take the high road" by preparing to fight for a better deal in three years.

"We feel very strongly that SAG members should not vote to authorize a strike at this time," the letter said. "We don't think that an authorization can be looked at as merely a bargaining tool. It must be looked at as what it is -- an agreement to strike if negotiations fail."

The letter comes with SAG scheduled to send out a strike authorization vote Jan. 2 to its 110,000 dues current members with ballots due back Jan. 23. For a strike to occur, at least 75% of those voting would have to affirm the authorization with the national board having the final say over a work stoppage.

"We support our union and we support the issues we're fighting for, but we do not believe in all good conscience that now is the time to be putting people out of work," the letter also said. "None of our friends in the other unions are truly happy with the deals they made in their negotiations. Three years from now all the union contracts will be up again at roughly the same time. At that point if we plan and work together with our sister unions we will have incredible leverage."

The letter was sent a few hours after SAG president Alan Rosenberg called off Friday's emergency national board meeting in the face of objections over requiring that reps attend the Los Angeles confab in person. Over the weekend, Rosenberg scheduled the emergency meeting and blasted demands by SAG's New York reps that the upcoming strike authorization vote be called off due to the faltering economy.

The Gotham reps also want the guild's contract negotiating committee replaced in the hopes that a new panel can end the months-long stalemate with the majors. And they indicated that requiring cross-country travel on short notice, when videoconferencing equipment is readily available, could only be interpreted as a punitive move by Rosenberg that's designed to hold down attendance by those opposing the guild's Hollywood leadership.

Rosenberg did not respond to those concerns but continued to blast the New York reps.

"Rather than argue over the propriety of an in-person meeting I have decided to withdraw the meeting notice for now," he said. "However, you will be promptly notified should the meeting be rescheduled for a later date. I am disappointed that during these critical times not all of our board members are willing to take the time needed to make real progress on the issues dividing our elected leaders."

Rosenberg also complained that last week's regularly scheduled meeting of the national executive committee had been cut short because the New York members of the panel all left the meeting, depriving it of a quorum and preventing it from completing Guild business.

"Given this conduct, and the sensitivity and complexity of the issues at hand, I do not believe a videoconference board meeting will be effective or productive," he added.

Tuesday, December 9, 2008

The Latest on SAG from the LA Times

Timing of SAG strike authorization vote may aid passage

The balloting process is set to occur this month when much of Hollywood is shut down, possibly resulting in a low turnout among opponents.
By Richard Verrier
December 8, 2008
There is a saying in politics that whoever controls the turnout wins the election. That's as true in Hollywood labor politics as it is in presidential elections.

A key vote later this month by members of the Screen Actors Guild could push the entertainment industry toward another bitter strike, almost a year after screenwriters ended a 100-day walkout. The union's negotiators say they need the strike authorization vote to give them leverage in contract talks with the studios that have stalled for months.

The question is, why would SAG hold such an important vote over the December holidays, when much of Hollywood shuts down? Some union critics think the timing is suspicious, and claim that SAG leaders would like nothing more than to see a low turnout, particularly among working actors who are the most likely to oppose a walkout.

But people close to the union's negotiating committee say the vote at month's end is necessary to give the guild enough time to conduct its "educational campaign" to build support for its cause at a time when the union remains sharply divided over the best course of action.

That's in marked contrast to the Writers Guild of America, which was firmly united when members overwhelmingly approved a strike authorization last year.

SAG, on the other hand, has been beset by feuds between moderates and hard-liners over negotiating strategy, contract demands and strained relations with its sister actors union, the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (AFTRA quickly reached a new contract with the studios and is poised to expand its jurisdiction into prime-time TV shows typically covered under SAG contracts). The 44,000 members who belong to both unions could play a key role in the strike referendum, given that most of them already endorsed the AFTRA contract, which is virtually identical to the one the studios are offering SAG.

Although some prominent actors, including Rob Morrow and former SAG President Ed Asner, have declared their support for the union's leadership, other household names have openly challenged holding a strike authorization during the worst recession in decades.

"We do not believe in all good conscience now is the time to be putting people out of work," actress Rhea Perlman and her husband, actor Danny DeVito, wrote in a recent letter to SAG directors that was widely circulated.

The sparring has extended into SAG's 71-member board as well. New York board member and former SAG President Richard Masur has blasted SAG leaders for their handling of the failed federal mediation talks, which precipitated the strike authorization vote. SAG President Alan Rosenberg returned fire at critics, saying negotiators did everything they could to keep talks alive in the face of studio intransigence.

Studio executives do not appear fretful about the prospect of a strike -- as they were last year when the writers were ramping up to walk out -- because they're betting that SAG members will not vote for strike authorization given the recession, with its attendant widespread layoffs, that is now washing over media companies.

Still, the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, which bargains on behalf of the studios, isn't taking anything for granted. The group has launched its own campaign targeting SAG members. The alliance took the unusual step last week of posting its final contract offer on its website and issued missives that attempt to portray SAG leaders as out of touch with economic reality.

Although the economy will almost certainly be a factor in the vote, it's unclear how much of an effect it will have because of the divergent makeup of SAG's membership.

Working actors -- those who rely on work in film and TV for their primary source of income -- account for about 10% of the guild's membership.

Instead, 90% of SAG's members earn less than $28,000 a year from acting work and, putting aside the multiplier effect for a moment, have less at stake if TV and film production shuts down in Hollywood.

Moreover, Membership First, the faction that dominates the Screen Actors Guild, has proved in the past that it can be effective in mobilizing support among extras and actors who work only occasionally.

"It's a unique feature of this particular union that there is a very large chunk of underemployed and unemployed, and I think that could work in the union's favor," said David Smith, a labor economist at Pepperdine University. "Still, I think getting the strike authorization will be a tall order given the economic crisis. That will be on many actors' minds."

Short of SAG and the studios reaching an 11th-hour bargain, strike authorization ballots will be mailed out to about 100,000 eligible SAG members (those who are paid-up on dues) at the end of the month. Balloting takes three weeks. A thumbs-up on the measure requires approval from three-fourths of members who return ballots.

Still, even if the members authorize a strike, the final decision whether or not to actually walk out is left to the guild's 71-member board.

Moderates who hold a slim majority on the board aren't expected to support a strike unless there is an overwhelming mandate from members. That makes the size of the "yes" vote crucial.

But, paradoxically, a small turnout could actually work to the advantage of SAG's leaders if the respondents skew toward nonworking actors who are more likely to favor a walkout. SAG referendums typically draw a turnout of 25% to 30%, and a recent survey conducted by the union drew 10%. Of them, nearly 90% supported seeking a better deal than what the studios proposed in their "final offer."

Given the high stakes involved, and heavy campaigning on both sides, turnout should be considerably higher this time around.

But holding the referendum over the year-end holidays could mean a smaller turnout by working actors, who often get their mail sent to business managers, whose offices will be closed.

But sources close to the guild's negotiating committee say the delay is necessary to give the guild time to make its case to members and build support through a series of town hall meetings, mailings, e-mails from SAG leaders and videos on the union's website. SAG also has invited publicists and agents to attend a meeting at the union's headquarters Wednesday.

Said one board member: "We only have one stab at getting this right and we didn't want to rush anything."

Monday, June 30, 2008

6 Week Acting to Camera Intensive in Santa Fe!

We're thrilled to announce Acting Classes in Santa Fe! The Acting to Camera Intensive with Casting Director, Karl Wildman, and Certified Coach, Lucy River. This is a six-part series of classes that focus on audition technique, on-camera performance, script-work, cold reading, scene study, and of course, acting skills. Enrollment is limited to ten participants. Take this opportunity to hit the fall running! For More Information: Email lucy@acting4life.com or phone 505-514-0195 (please use area code). Or visit their website here!

Thursday, May 22, 2008

Introducing New Mexico Actor Ross Nederhoff




New Mexico actor Ross Nederhoff is one of our newest Cast members! This talented young man is a passionate and dedicated New Mexico actor ready to graduate from theater to larger and more intricate roles in the New Mexico film industry. He had done modeling musical theater and many plays, and received acting training by Triple Threat Performers and the PMAA film school.

Learn more about Ross by clicking http://www.crewnewmexico.com/rossnederhoff

Wednesday, May 7, 2008

SAG Contract Update

The Screen Actors Guild and the majors have launched their fourth week of feature-primetime talks with a deadline looming to wrap up negotiations by Tuesday afternoon.

The session -- the 17th since bargaining began April 15 -- began at mid-morning Monday at the headquarters of the Alliance of Motion Picture & Television Producers in Encino.

Both sides have continued to observe the unofficial news blackout since Friday's announcement that talks would be extended on a day-to-day basis through Tuesday.

The extension was triggered by SAG's move to drop its demand for a doubling of DVD residuals and seek a hike in pension and health contributions on DVD residuals. SAG also agreed Friday to drop several pay hike demands.

SAG's contract expires June 30 and the lack of resolution has caused headaches for the studios, which have stopped greenlighting features until SAG signs a deal.

If SAG does not make a deal this week, it runs the risk of the rival American Federation of Television & Radio Artists making a primetime deal and using that to expand its coverage. AFTRA's primetime negotiations have been pushed back twice with AFTRA talks now slated to begin Wednesday.

Reprinted from Variety, March 5